🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have harvested millions of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to release them publicly.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts noted the apparent data breach could boost artificial intelligence firms looking for material to develop their models.

A group known as Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not represent its full inventory.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” said a Spotify spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access found a external actor collected public metadata and used illicit methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Declared Mission and Worries

The streaming service does not believe the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would likely be utilized for training AI models.

“Educating models on pirated material is sadly common in the AI industry, so this stolen music is almost certain to end up training AI models,” he stated.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a vast online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “create their own personal free version of Spotify”. The executive said it could also allow technology firms to “educate models on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a government suggestion to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Almost every participant to a government consultation on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.